Last week, my ACA 20 was once again killed in the Assembly Elections Committee. As you can see from the press release above, this measure would have changed the title and summary process for the placement of initiatives on the statewide ballot. Currently, the Attorney General, a partisan elected official, is charged with developing the Title and Summary of initiatives. ACA 20 would give this responsibility to the non-partisan Legislative Analyst.
Ballot titles and summaries can have an extreme effect on the passage or failure of a ballot initiative. Often, this is the only information that a voter ever reads about a ballot initiative, and if that language is written with an inherent bias…there is no doubt that it can have an effect on the outcome.
Recently, we’ve seen many initiatives written this way…but the most recent and timely example is what the Attorney General has done with Senator George Runner’s initiative to require an ID to be shown at the polls. Senator Runner writes about the issue in this article in the San Bernardino Sun.
Regardless of what you think of the initiative, you cannot deny the fact that in a short time span of four years, a vastly different title and summary was put on this initiative. The former attorney general, Bill Lockyer, titled nearly identical initiative language in 2005, the “Voter Identication Requirement”. The first line of the summary simply says that the initiative “requires that voters present one of four types of picture identification before voting…”
Attorney General Jerry Brown has now titled Senator Runner’s initiative, that contains nearly identical language, “Limits on Voting.” And the first line of the summary states, “Prohibits citizens from voting at the polls unless they present a government-issued photo ID card.”